Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ImmunoLingo: Linguistics-based formalization of the antibody language (2209.12635v2)

Published 26 Sep 2022 in q-bio.QM and cs.LG

Abstract: Apparent parallels between natural language and biological sequence have led to a recent surge in the application of deep LLMs (LMs) to the analysis of antibody and other biological sequences. However, a lack of a rigorous linguistic formalization of biological sequence languages, which would define basic components, such as lexicon (i.e., the discrete units of the language) and grammar (i.e., the rules that link sequence well-formedness, structure, and meaning) has led to largely domain-unspecific applications of LMs, which do not take into account the underlying structure of the biological sequences studied. A linguistic formalization, on the other hand, establishes linguistically-informed and thus domain-adapted components for LM applications. It would facilitate a better understanding of how differences and similarities between natural language and biological sequences influence the quality of LMs, which is crucial for the design of interpretable models with extractable sequence-functions relationship rules, such as the ones underlying the antibody specificity prediction problem. Deciphering the rules of antibody specificity is crucial to accelerating rational and in silico biotherapeutic drug design. Here, we formalize the properties of the antibody language and thereby establish not only a foundation for the application of linguistic tools in adaptive immune receptor analysis but also for the systematic immunolinguistic studies of immune receptor specificity in general.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Mai Ha Vu (2 papers)
  2. Philippe A. Robert (5 papers)
  3. Rahmad Akbar (6 papers)
  4. Bartlomiej Swiatczak (2 papers)
  5. Geir Kjetil Sandve (10 papers)
  6. Dag Trygve Truslew Haug (2 papers)
  7. Victor Greiff (12 papers)
Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.