Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Model-Checking Probabilistic $ω$-Pushdown Systems, and $ω$-PCTL$^*$ Characterization of Weak Bisimulation (2209.10517v13)

Published 21 Sep 2022 in cs.LO, cs.FL, and quant-ph

Abstract: In this paper, we obtain the following equally important new results: We first extend the notion of {\em probabilistic pushdown automaton} to {\em probabilistic $\omega$-pushdown automaton} for the first time and study the model-checking question of {\em stateless probabilistic $\omega$-pushdown system ($\omega$-pBPA)} against $\omega$-PCTL (defined by Chatterjee, Sen, and Henzinger in \cite{CSH08}), showing that model-checking of {\em stateless probabilistic $\omega$-pushdown systems ($\omega$-pBPA)} against $\omega$-PCTL is generally undecidable. Our approach is to construct $\omega$-PCTL formulas encoding the {\em Post Correspondence Problem}. We study and analyze the soundness and completeness of {\em weak bisimulation} for {\em $\omega$ probabilistic computational tree logic ($\omega$-PCTL$*$)}, showing that it is sound and complete. Our models are probabilistic labelled transition systems induced by probabilistic $\omega$-pushdown automata defined in this paper.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)