Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Data-driven and machine-learning based prediction of wave propagation behavior in dam-break flood (2209.08729v1)

Published 19 Sep 2022 in physics.flu-dyn and stat.ML

Abstract: The computational prediction of wave propagation in dam-break floods is a long-standing problem in hydrodynamics and hydrology. Until now, conventional numerical models based on Saint-Venant equations are the dominant approaches. Here we show that a machine learning model that is well-trained on a minimal amount of data, can help predict the long-term dynamic behavior of a one-dimensional dam-break flood with satisfactory accuracy. For this purpose, we solve the Saint-Venant equations for a one-dimensional dam-break flood scenario using the Lax-Wendroff numerical scheme and train the reservoir computing echo state network (RC-ESN) with the dataset by the simulation results consisting of time-sequence flow depths. We demonstrate a good prediction ability of the RC-ESN model, which ahead predicts wave propagation behavior 286 time-steps in the dam-break flood with a root mean square error (RMSE) smaller than 0.01, outperforming the conventional long short-term memory (LSTM) model which reaches a comparable RMSE of only 81 time-steps ahead. To show the performance of the RC-ESN model, we also provide a sensitivity analysis of the prediction accuracy concerning the key parameters including training set size, reservoir size, and spectral radius. Results indicate that the RC-ESN are less dependent on the training set size, a medium reservoir size K=1200~2600 is sufficient. We confirm that the spectral radius \r{ho} shows a complex influence on the prediction accuracy and suggest a smaller spectral radius \r{ho} currently. By changing the initial flow depth of the dam break, we also obtained the conclusion that the prediction horizon of RC-ESN is larger than that of LSTM.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Changli Li (1 paper)
  2. Zheng Han (31 papers)
  3. Yange Li (1 paper)
  4. Ming Li (789 papers)
  5. Weidong Wang (44 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.