Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 74 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 186 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 446 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Case Study on the Classification of Lost Circulation Events During Drilling using Machine Learning Techniques on an Imbalanced Large Dataset (2209.01607v2)

Published 4 Sep 2022 in cs.LG and physics.geo-ph

Abstract: This study presents machine learning models that forecast and categorize lost circulation severity preemptively using a large class imbalanced drilling dataset. We demonstrate reproducible core techniques involved in tackling a large drilling engineering challenge utilizing easily interpretable machine learning approaches. We utilized a 65,000+ records data with class imbalance problem from Azadegan oilfield formations in Iran. Eleven of the dataset's seventeen parameters are chosen to be used in the classification of five lost circulation events. To generate classification models, we used six basic machine learning algorithms and four ensemble learning methods. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) are the six fundamental techniques. We also used bagging and boosting ensemble learning techniques in the investigation of solutions for improved predicting performance. The performance of these algorithms is measured using four metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The F1-score weighted to represent the data imbalance is chosen as the preferred evaluation criterion. The CART model was found to be the best in class for identifying drilling fluid circulation loss events with an average weighted F1-score of 0.9904 and standard deviation of 0.0015. Upon application of ensemble learning techniques, a Random Forest ensemble of decision trees showed the best predictive performance. It identified and classified lost circulation events with a perfect weighted F1-score of 1.0. Using Permutation Feature Importance (PFI), the measured depth was found to be the most influential factor in accurately recognizing lost circulation events while drilling.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube