Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Swin-transformer-yolov5 For Real-time Wine Grape Bunch Detection (2208.14508v3)

Published 30 Aug 2022 in cs.CV

Abstract: In this research, an integrated detection model, Swin-transformer-YOLOv5 or Swin-T-YOLOv5, was proposed for real-time wine grape bunch detection to inherit the advantages from both YOLOv5 and Swin-transformer. The research was conducted on two different grape varieties of Chardonnay (always white berry skin) and Merlot (white or white-red mix berry skin when immature; red when matured) from July to September in 2019. To verify the superiority of Swin-T-YOLOv5, its performance was compared against several commonly used/competitive object detectors, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, YOLOv4, and YOLOv5. All models were assessed under different test conditions, including two different weather conditions (sunny and cloudy), two different berry maturity stages (immature and mature), and three different sunlight directions/intensities (morning, noon, and afternoon) for a comprehensive comparison. Additionally, the predicted number of grape bunches by Swin-T-YOLOv5 was further compared with ground truth values, including both in-field manual counting and manual labeling during the annotation process. Results showed that the proposed Swin-T-YOLOv5 outperformed all other studied models for grape bunch detection, with up to 97% of mean Average Precision (mAP) and 0.89 of F1-score when the weather was cloudy. This mAP was approximately 44%, 18%, 14%, and 4% greater than Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, YOLOv4, and YOLOv5, respectively. Swin-T-YOLOv5 achieved its lowest mAP (90%) and F1-score (0.82) when detecting immature berries, where the mAP was approximately 40%, 5%, 3%, and 1% greater than the same. Furthermore, Swin-T-YOLOv5 performed better on Chardonnay variety with achieved up to 0.91 of R2 and 2.36 root mean square error (RMSE) when comparing the predictions with ground truth. However, it underperformed on Merlot variety with achieved only up to 0.70 of R2 and 3.30 of RMSE.

Citations (34)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.