Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 40 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Spiral Contrastive Learning: An Efficient 3D Representation Learning Method for Unannotated CT Lesions (2208.10694v1)

Published 23 Aug 2022 in cs.CV

Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) samples with pathological annotations are difficult to obtain. As a result, the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms are trained on small datasets (e.g., LIDC-IDRI with 1,018 samples), limiting their accuracies and reliability. In the past five years, several works have tailored for unsupervised representations of CT lesions via two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) self-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms. The 2D algorithms have difficulty capturing 3D information, and existing 3D algorithms are computationally heavy. Light-weight 3D SSL remains the boundary to explore. In this paper, we propose the spiral contrastive learning (SCL), which yields 3D representations in a computationally efficient manner. SCL first transforms 3D lesions to the 2D plane using an information-preserving spiral transformation, and then learn transformation-invariant features using 2D contrastive learning. For the augmentation, we consider natural image augmentations and medical image augmentations. We evaluate SCL by training a classification head upon the embedding layer. Experimental results show that SCL achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on LIDC-IDRI (89.72%), LNDb (82.09%) and TianChi (90.16%) for unsupervised representation learning. With 10% annotated data for fine-tune, the performance of SCL is comparable to that of supervised learning algorithms (85.75% vs. 85.03% on LIDC-IDRI, 78.20% vs. 73.44% on LNDb and 87.85% vs. 83.34% on TianChi, respectively). Meanwhile, SCL reduces the computational effort by 66.98% compared to other 3D SSL algorithms, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed method in unsupervised pre-training.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.