Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Non-asymptotic convergence bounds for modified tamed unadjusted Langevin algorithm in non-convex setting (2207.02600v2)

Published 6 Jul 2022 in math.PR, cs.NA, math.NA, math.OC, math.ST, stat.CO, and stat.TH

Abstract: We consider the problem of sampling from a high-dimensional target distribution $\pi_\beta$ on $\mathbb{R}d$ with density proportional to $\theta\mapsto e{-\beta U(\theta)}$ using explicit numerical schemes based on discretising the Langevin stochastic differential equation (SDE). In recent literature, taming has been proposed and studied as a method for ensuring stability of Langevin-based numerical schemes in the case of super-linearly growing drift coefficients for the Langevin SDE. In particular, the Tamed Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (TULA) was proposed in [Bro+19] to sample from such target distributions with the gradient of the potential $U$ being super-linearly growing. However, theoretical guarantees in Wasserstein distances for Langevin-based algorithms have traditionally been derived assuming strong convexity of the potential $U$. In this paper, we propose a novel taming factor and derive, under a setting with possibly non-convex potential $U$ and super-linearly growing gradient of $U$, non-asymptotic theoretical bounds in Wasserstein-1 and Wasserstein-2 distances between the law of our algorithm, which we name the modified Tamed Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (mTULA), and the target distribution $\pi_\beta$. We obtain respective rates of convergence $\mathcal{O}(\lambda)$ and $\mathcal{O}(\lambda{1/2})$ in Wasserstein-1 and Wasserstein-2 distances for the discretisation error of mTULA in step size $\lambda$. High-dimensional numerical simulations which support our theoretical findings are presented to showcase the applicability of our algorithm.

Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.