Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Metric Dimension Parameterized by Feedback Vertex Set and Other Structural Parameters

Published 30 Jun 2022 in cs.DM, cs.CC, and cs.DS | (2206.15424v3)

Abstract: For a graph GG, a subset S⊆V(G)S \subseteq V(G) is called a \emph{resolving set} if for any two vertices u,v∈V(G)u,v \in V(G), there exists a vertex w∈Sw \in S such that d(w,u)≠d(w,v)d(w,u) \neq d(w,v). The {\sc Metric Dimension} problem takes as input a graph GG and a positive integer kk, and asks whether there exists a resolving set of size at most kk. This problem was introduced in the 1970s and is known to be \NP-hard~[GT~61 in Garey and Johnson's book]. In the realm of parameterized complexity, Hartung and Nichterlein~[CCC~2013] proved that the problem is \W[2]-hard when parameterized by the natural parameter kk. They also observed that it is \FPT\ when parameterized by the vertex cover number and asked about its complexity under \emph{smaller} parameters, in particular the feedback vertex set number. We answer this question by proving that {\sc Metric Dimension} is \W[1]-hard when parameterized by the combined parameter feedback vertex set number plus pathwidth. This also improves the result of Bonnet and Purohit~[IPEC 2019] which states that the problem is \W[1]-hard parameterized by the pathwidth. On the positive side, we show that {\sc Metric Dimension} is \FPT\ when parameterized by either the distance to cluster or the distance to co-cluster, both of which are smaller parameters than the vertex cover number.

Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.