Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 54 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 182 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sparse Temporal Spanners with Low Stretch (2206.11113v1)

Published 22 Jun 2022 in cs.DS

Abstract: A temporal graph is an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ along with a function that assigns a time-label to each edge in $E$. A path in $G$ with non-decreasing time-labels is called temporal path and the distance from $u$ to $v$ is the minimum length (i.e., the number of edges) of a temporal path from $u$ to $v$. A temporal $\alpha$-spanner of $G$ is a (temporal) subgraph $H$ that preserves the distances between any pair of vertices in $V$, up to a multiplicative stretch factor of $\alpha$. The size of $H$ is the number of its edges. In this work we study the size-stretch trade-offs of temporal spanners. We show that temporal cliques always admit a temporal $(2k-1)-$spanner with $\tilde{O}(kn{1+\frac{1}{k}})$ edges, where $k>1$ is an integer parameter of choice. Choosing $k=\lfloor\log n\rfloor$, we obtain a temporal $O(\log n)$-spanner with $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges that has almost the same size (up to logarithmic factors) as the temporal spanner in [Casteigts et al., JCSS 2021] which only preserves temporal connectivity. We then consider general temporal graphs. Since $\Omega(n2)$ edges might be needed by any connectivity-preserving temporal subgraph [Axiotis et al., ICALP'16], we focus on approximating distances from a single source. We show that $\tilde{O}(n/\log(1+\varepsilon))$ edges suffice to obtain a stretch of $(1+\varepsilon)$, for any small $\varepsilon>0$. This result is essentially tight since there are temporal graphs for which any temporal subgraph preserving exact distances from a single-source must use $\Omega(n2)$ edges. We extend our analysis to prove an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(n2/\beta)$ on the size of any temporal $\beta$-additive spanner, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors. Finally, we investigate how the lifetime of $G$, i.e., the number of its distinct time-labels, affects the trade-off between the size and the stretch of a temporal spanner.

Citations (9)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube