Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Learning a Single Neuron with Adversarial Label Noise via Gradient Descent

Published 17 Jun 2022 in cs.LG, cs.DS, math.ST, stat.ML, and stat.TH | (2206.08918v1)

Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of learning a single neuron, i.e., a function of the form x↦σ(w⋅x)\mathbf{x}\mapsto\sigma(\mathbf{w}\cdot\mathbf{x}) for monotone activations σ:R↦R\sigma:\mathbb{R}\mapsto\mathbb{R}, with respect to the L2<sup>2L_2<sup>2-loss in the presence of adversarial label noise. Specifically, we are given labeled examples from a distribution DD on (x,y)∈R<sup>d</sup>×R(\mathbf{x}, y)\in\mathbb{R}<sup>d</sup> \times \mathbb{R} such that there exists w<sup>∗∈R<sup>d\mathbf{w}<sup>\ast\in\mathbb{R}<sup>d achieving F(w<sup>∗)=ϵF(\mathbf{w}<sup>\ast)=\epsilon, where F(w)=E(x,y)∼D[(σ(w⋅x)−y)<sup>2]F(\mathbf{w})=\mathbf{E}_{(\mathbf{x},y)\sim D}[(\sigma(\mathbf{w}\cdot \mathbf{x})-y)<sup>2]. The goal of the learner is to output a hypothesis vector w\mathbf{w} such that F(w)=C ϵF(\mathbb{w})=C\, \epsilon with high probability, where $C&gt;1$ is a universal constant. As our main contribution, we give efficient constant-factor approximate learners for a broad class of distributions (including log-concave distributions) and activation functions. Concretely, for the class of isotropic log-concave distributions, we obtain the following important corollaries: For the logistic activation, we obtain the first polynomial-time constant factor approximation (even under the Gaussian distribution). Our algorithm has sample complexity O~(d/ϵ)\widetilde{O}(d/\epsilon), which is tight within polylogarithmic factors. For the ReLU activation, we give an efficient algorithm with sample complexity $\tilde{O}(d\, \polylog(1/\epsilon))$. Prior to our work, the best known constant-factor approximate learner had sample complexity Ω~(d/ϵ)\tilde{\Omega}(d/\epsilon). In both of these settings, our algorithms are simple, performing gradient-descent on the (regularized) L2<sup>2L_2<sup>2-loss. The correctness of our algorithms relies on novel structural results that we establish, showing that (essentially all) stationary points of the underlying non-convex loss are approximately optimal.

Citations (20)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.