Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Complexity of Weighted Diameter and Radius in CONGEST Networks (2206.02767v2)

Published 6 Jun 2022 in cs.DC and quant-ph

Abstract: This paper studies the round complexity of computing the weighted diameter and radius of a graph in the quantum CONGEST model. We present a quantum algorithm that $(1+o(1))$-approximates the diameter and radius with round complexity $\widetilde O\left(\min\left{n{9/10}D{3/10},n\right}\right)$, where $D$ denotes the unweighted diameter. This exhibits the advantages of quantum communication over classical communication since computing a $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation of the diameter and radius in a classical CONGEST network takes $\widetilde\Omega(n)$ rounds, even if $D$ is constant [Abboud, Censor-Hillel, and Khoury, DISC '16]. We also prove a lower bound of $\widetilde\Omega(n{2/3})$ for $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-approximating the weighted diameter/radius in quantum CONGEST networks, even if $D=\Theta(\log n)$. Thus, in quantum CONGEST networks, computing weighted diameter and weighted radius of graphs with small $D$ is strictly harder than unweighted ones due to Le Gall and Magniez's $\widetilde O\left(\sqrt{nD}\right)$-round algorithm for unweighted diameter/radius [PODC '18].

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)