Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 190 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 438 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Map-based Visual-Inertial Localization: Consistency and Complexity (2204.12173v1)

Published 26 Apr 2022 in cs.RO

Abstract: Drift-free localization is essential for autonomous vehicles. In this paper, we address the problem by proposing a filter-based framework, which integrates the visual-inertial odometry and the measurements of the features in the pre-built map. In this framework, the transformation between the odometry frame and the map frame is augmented into the state and estimated on the fly. Besides, we maintain only the keyframe poses in the map and employ Schmidt extended Kalman filter to update the state partially, so that the uncertainty of the map information can be consistently considered with low computational cost. Moreover, we theoretically demonstrate that the ever-changing linearization points of the estimated state can introduce spurious information to the augmented system and make the original four-dimensional unobservable subspace vanish, leading to inconsistent estimation in practice. To relieve this problem, we employ first-estimate Jacobian (FEJ) to maintain the correct observability properties of the augmented system. Furthermore, we introduce an observability-constrained updating method to compensate for the significant accumulated error after the long-term absence (can be 3 minutes and 1 km) of map-based measurements. Through simulations, the consistent estimation of our proposed algorithm is validated. Through real-world experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed algorithm runs successfully on four kinds of datasets with the lower computational cost (20% time-saving) and the better estimation accuracy (45% trajectory error reduction) compared with the baseline algorithm VINS-Fusion, whereas VINS-Fusion fails to give bounded localization performance on three of four datasets because of its inconsistent estimation.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube