Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 138 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Semialgebraic Range Reporting (2203.07096v2)

Published 14 Mar 2022 in cs.CG

Abstract: In the problem of semialgebraic range searching, we are to preprocess a set of points in $\mathbb{R}D$ such that the subset of points inside a semialgebraic region described by $O(1)$ polynomial inequalities of degree $\Delta$ can be found efficiently. Relatively recently, several major advances were made on this problem. Using algebraic techniques, "near-linear space" structures [AMS13,MP15] with almost optimal query time of $Q(n)=O(n{1-1/D+o(1)})$ were obtained. For "fast query" structures (i.e., when $Q(n)=n{o(1)}$), it was conjectured that a structure with space $S(n) = O(n{D+o(1)})$ is possible. The conjecture was refuted recently by Afshani and Cheng [AC21]. In the plane, they proved that $S(n) = \Omega(n{\Delta+1 - o(1)}/Q(n){(\Delta+3)\Delta/2})$ which shows $\Omega(n{\Delta+1-o(1)})$ space is needed for $Q(n) = n{o(1)}$. While this refutes the conjecture, it still leaves a number of unresolved issues: the lower bound only works in 2D and for fast queries, and neither the exponent of $n$ or $Q(n)$ seem to be tight even for $D=2$, as the current upper bound is $S(n) = O(n{\boldsymbol{m}+o(1)}/Q(n){(\boldsymbol{m}-1)D/(D-1)})$ where $\boldsymbol{m}=\binom{D+\Delta}{D}-1 = \Omega(\DeltaD)$ is the maximum number of parameters to define a monic degree-$\Delta$ $D$-variate polynomial, for any $D,\Delta=O(1)$. In this paper, we resolve two of the issues: we prove a lower bound in $D$-dimensions and show that when $Q(n)=n{o(1)}+O(k)$, $S(n)=\Omega(n{\boldsymbol{m}-o(1)})$, which is almost tight as far as the exponent of $n$ is considered in the pointer machine model. When considering the exponent of $Q(n)$, we show that the analysis in [AC21] is tight for $D=2$, by presenting matching upper bounds for uniform random point sets. This shows either the existing upper bounds can be improved or a new fundamentally different input set is needed to get a better lower bound.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube