Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 94 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 177 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Structural Results for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines (2203.01741v2)

Published 3 Mar 2022 in cs.DS

Abstract: Parameterizing by the largest processing time $p_{max}$ and the number of different job processing times $d$, we propose a proximity technique for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines for the objectives Makespan Minimization ($C_{max}$) and Santa Claus ($C_{min}$) to obtain new structural results for these problems. The novelty in our approach is that we deal with a fractional solution for only a sub-instance, where the sub-instance itself is not known a priori. While the construction and computation of the fractional solution -- in contrast to usual proximity techniques -- is not done in polynomial time, this also allows us to formulate a comparably strong and general proximity statement. Eventually, this allows us to reduce the number of jobs that need to be distributed to a polynomial in $p_{max}$ for each machine and job type, by preassigning jobs according to the fractional solution, essentially returning a bounded number (at most $O(p_{max}{O(d2)})$) of kernels, one for each (guessed) sub-instance. We can use our structural results to obtain an algorithm with running time is $p_{max}{O(d2)}poly|I|$, matching the best-known so far by Knop et al. (Oper. Res. Lett. '21). Moreover, we propose an $p_{max}{O(d2)} poly |I|$ time algorithm for Envy Minimization $C_{envy}$ in the High-Multiplicity Setting on Uniform Machines, showing that this problem is \textsc{fpt} in $p_{max}$. Eventually, we also propose a general mechanism to bound the largest coefficient in the Configuration ILP for so called \emph{Load Balancing Problems} by $(dp_{max}){O(d)}$, which we hope to be of interest for the development of algorithms.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.