Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Structural Results for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines (2203.01741v2)

Published 3 Mar 2022 in cs.DS

Abstract: Parameterizing by the largest processing time $p_{max}$ and the number of different job processing times $d$, we propose a proximity technique for High-Multiplicity Scheduling on Uniform Machines for the objectives Makespan Minimization ($C_{max}$) and Santa Claus ($C_{min}$) to obtain new structural results for these problems. The novelty in our approach is that we deal with a fractional solution for only a sub-instance, where the sub-instance itself is not known a priori. While the construction and computation of the fractional solution -- in contrast to usual proximity techniques -- is not done in polynomial time, this also allows us to formulate a comparably strong and general proximity statement. Eventually, this allows us to reduce the number of jobs that need to be distributed to a polynomial in $p_{max}$ for each machine and job type, by preassigning jobs according to the fractional solution, essentially returning a bounded number (at most $O(p_{max}{O(d2)})$) of kernels, one for each (guessed) sub-instance. We can use our structural results to obtain an algorithm with running time is $p_{max}{O(d2)}poly|I|$, matching the best-known so far by Knop et al. (Oper. Res. Lett. '21). Moreover, we propose an $p_{max}{O(d2)} poly |I|$ time algorithm for Envy Minimization $C_{envy}$ in the High-Multiplicity Setting on Uniform Machines, showing that this problem is \textsc{fpt} in $p_{max}$. Eventually, we also propose a general mechanism to bound the largest coefficient in the Configuration ILP for so called \emph{Load Balancing Problems} by $(dp_{max}){O(d)}$, which we hope to be of interest for the development of algorithms.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube