Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 152 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 94 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Constant matters: Fine-grained Complexity of Differentially Private Continual Observation (2202.11205v6)

Published 23 Feb 2022 in cs.DS and cs.LG

Abstract: We study fine-grained error bounds for differentially private algorithms for counting under continual observation. Our main insight is that the matrix mechanism when using lower-triangular matrices can be used in the continual observation model. More specifically, we give an explicit factorization for the counting matrix $M_\mathsf{count}$ and upper bound the error explicitly. We also give a fine-grained analysis, specifying the exact constant in the upper bound. Our analysis is based on upper and lower bounds of the {\em completely bounded norm} (cb-norm) of $M_\mathsf{count}$. Along the way, we improve the best-known bound of 28 years by Mathias (SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 1993) on the cb-norm of $M_\mathsf{count}$ for a large range of the dimension of $M_\mathsf{count}$. Furthermore, we are the first to give concrete error bounds for various problems under continual observation such as binary counting, maintaining a histogram, releasing an approximately cut-preserving synthetic graph, many graph-based statistics, and substring and episode counting. Finally, we note that our result can be used to get a fine-grained error bound for non-interactive local learning {and the first lower bounds on the additive error for $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differentially-private counting under continual observation.} Subsequent to this work, Henzinger et al. (SODA2023) showed that our factorization also achieves fine-grained mean-squared error.

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Questions

We haven't generated a list of open questions mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: