Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Stochastic Gradient Descent with Dependent Data for Offline Reinforcement Learning (2202.02850v1)

Published 6 Feb 2022 in cs.LG and math.OC

Abstract: In reinforcement learning (RL), offline learning decoupled learning from data collection and is useful in dealing with exploration-exploitation tradeoff and enables data reuse in many applications. In this work, we study two offline learning tasks: policy evaluation and policy learning. For policy evaluation, we formulate it as a stochastic optimization problem and show that it can be solved using approximate stochastic gradient descent (aSGD) with time-dependent data. We show aSGD achieves $\tilde O(1/t)$ convergence when the loss function is strongly convex and the rate is independent of the discount factor $\gamma$. This result can be extended to include algorithms making approximately contractive iterations such as TD(0). The policy evaluation algorithm is then combined with the policy iteration algorithm to learn the optimal policy. To achieve an $\epsilon$ accuracy, the complexity of the algorithm is $\tilde O(\epsilon{-2}(1-\gamma){-5})$, which matches the complexity bound for classic online RL algorithms such as Q-learning.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)