Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 42 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the Satisfaction Probabilities of $k$-CNF Formulas (2201.08895v4)

Published 21 Jan 2022 in cs.CC and cs.LO

Abstract: The satisfaction probability Pr[$\phi$] := Pr${\beta:vars(\phi) \to {0,1}}[\beta\models \phi]$ of a propositional formula $\phi$ is the likelihood that a random assignment $\beta$ makes the formula true. We study the complexity of the problem $k$SAT-Pr${>p}$ = {$\phi$ is a $k$CNF formula | Pr[$\phi$] > p} for fixed $k$ and $p$. While 3SAT-Pr${>0}$ = 3SAT is NP-complete and SAT-Pr${>1/2}$ is PP-complete, Akmal and Williams recently showed that 3SAT-Pr${>1/2}$ lies in P and 4SAT-Pr${>1/2}$ is NP-complete; but the methods used to prove these striking results stay silent about, say, 4SAT-Pr${>3/4}$, leaving the computational complexity of $k$SAT-Pr${>p}$ open for most $k$ and $p$. In the present paper we give a complete characterization in the form of a trichotomy: $k$SAT-Pr${>p}$ lies in AC$0$, is NL-complete, or is NP-complete. The proof of the trichotomy hinges on a new order-theoretic insight: Every set of $k$CNF formulas contains a formula of maximum satisfaction probability. This deceptively simple statement allows us to (1) kernelize $k$SAT-Pr${\ge p}$ for the joint parameters $k$ and $p$, (2) show that the variables of the kernel form a backdoor set when the trichotomy states membership in AC$0$ or NL, and (3) prove locality properties for $k$CNF formulas $\phi$, by which Pr[$\phi$] < $p$ implies that Pr[$\psi$] < $p$ holds already for a subset $\psi$ of $\phi$'s clauses whose size depends only on $k$ and $p$, and Pr[$\phi$] = $p$ implies $\phi \equiv \psi$ for some $k$CNF formula $\psi$ whose size once more depends only on $k$ and $p$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube