Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Minimizing $\ell_2$ Norm of Flow Time by Starvation Mitigation (2112.14403v4)

Published 29 Dec 2021 in cs.DS

Abstract: The assessment of a job's Quality of Service (QoS) often revolves around its flow time, also referred to as response time. This study delves into two fundamental objectives for scheduling jobs: the average flow time and the maximum flow time. While the Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT) algorithm minimizes average flow time, it can result in job starvation, causing certain jobs to experience disproportionately long and unfair flow times. In contrast, the First-Come-First-Served (FCFS) algorithm minimizes the maximum flow time but may compromise the average flow time. To strike a balance between these two objectives, a common approach is to minimize the $\ell_2$ norm of flow time. SRPT and FCFS are $O(n{\frac{1}{2}})$-competitive for this problem, where $n$ is the number of jobs. Prior to this work, no algorithm is known to achieve a competitive ratio better than SRPT and FCFS. In this paper, we use FCFS to mitigate the starvation caused by SRPT. Given a good estimate of $n$, we prove that this approach achieves a much better competitive ratio of $O(n{\frac{1}{3}})$. Our results provide the first theoretical evidence that mitigating starvation in SRPT leads to a provable improvement in scheduling performance.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.