Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Singleton-type bounds for list-decoding and list-recovery, and related results (2112.05592v1)

Published 10 Dec 2021 in cs.IT, math.CO, and math.IT

Abstract: List-decoding and list-recovery are important generalizations of unique decoding that received considerable attention over the years. However, the optimal trade-off among list-decoding (resp. list-recovery) radius, list size, and the code rate are not fully understood in both problems. This paper takes a step towards this direction when the list size is a given constant and the alphabet size is large (as a function of the code length). We prove a new Singleton-type upper bound for list-decodable codes, which improves upon the previously known bound by roughly a factor of $1/L$, where $L$ is the list size. We also prove a Singleton-type upper bound for list-recoverable codes, which is to the best of our knowledge, the first such bound for list-recovery. We apply these results to obtain new lower bounds that are optimal up to a multiplicative constant on the list size for list-decodable and list-recoverable codes with rates approaching capacity. Moreover, we show that list-decodable \emph{nonlinear} codes can strictly outperform list-decodable linear codes. More precisely, we show that there is a gap for a wide range of parameters, which grows fast with the alphabet size, between the size of the largest list-decodable nonlinear code and the size of the largest list-decodable linear codes. This is achieved by a novel connection between list-decoding and the notion of sparse hypergraphs in extremal combinatorics. We remark that such a gap is not known to exist in the problem of unique decoding. Lastly, we show that list-decodability or recoverability of codes implies in some sense good unique decodability.

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.