Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 39 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Multi-Object Grasping -- Estimating the Number of Objects in a Robotic Grasp (2112.01270v1)

Published 30 Nov 2021 in cs.RO and cs.LG

Abstract: A human hand can grasp a desired number of objects at once from a pile based solely on tactile sensing. To do so, a robot needs to grasp within a pile, sense the number of objects in the grasp before lifting, and predict the number of objects that will remain in the grasp after lifting. It is a challenging problem because when making the prediction, the robotic hand is still in the pile and the objects in the grasp are not observable to vision systems. Moreover, some objects that are grasped by the hand before lifting from the pile may fall out of the grasp when the hand is lifted. This occurs because they were supported by other objects in the pile instead of the fingers of the hand. Therefore, a robotic hand should sense the number of objects in a grasp using its tactile sensors before lifting. This paper presents novel multi-object grasping analyzing methods for solving this problem. They include a grasp volume calculation, tactile force analysis, and a data-driven deep learning approach. The methods have been implemented on a Barrett hand and then evaluated in simulations and a real setup with a robotic system. The evaluation results conclude that once the Barrett hand grasps multiple objects in the pile, the data-driven model can predict, before lifting, the number of objects that will remain in the hand after lifting. The root-mean-square errors for our approach are 0.74 for balls and 0.58 for cubes in simulations, and 1.06 for balls, and 1.45 for cubes in the real system.

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.