Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Decremental Connectivity in Non-Sparse Graphs (2111.09376v2)

Published 17 Nov 2021 in cs.DS

Abstract: We present a dynamic algorithm for maintaining the connected and 2-edge-connected components in an undirected graph subject to edge deletions. The algorithm is Monte-Carlo randomized and processes any sequence of edge deletions in $O(m + n \operatorname{polylog} n)$ total time. Interspersed with the deletions, it can answer queries to whether any two given vertices currently belong to the same (2-edge-)connected component in constant time. Our result is based on a general Monte-Carlo randomized reduction from decremental $c$-edge-connectivity to a variant of fully-dynamic $c$-edge-connectivity on a sparse graph. While being Monte-Carlo, our reduction supports a certain final self-check that can be used in Las Vegas algorithms for static problems such as Unique Perfect Matching. For non-sparse graphs with $\Omega(n \operatorname{polylog} n)$ edges, our connectivity and $2$-edge-connectivity algorithms handle all deletions in optimal linear total time, using existing algorithms for the respective fully-dynamic problems. This improves upon an $O(m \log (n2 / m) + n \operatorname{polylog} n)$-time algorithm of Thorup [J.Alg. 1999], which runs in linear time only for graphs with $\Omega(n2)$ edges. Our constant amortized cost for edge deletions in decremental connectivity in non-sparse graphs should be contrasted with an $\Omega(\log n/\log\log n)$ worst-case time lower bound in the decremental setting [Alstrup, Thore Husfeldt, FOCS'98] as well as an $\Omega(\log n)$ amortized time lower-bound in the fully-dynamic setting [Patrascu and Demaine STOC'04].

Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.