Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Unsupervised Lightweight Single Object Tracking with UHP-SOT++ (2111.07548v2)

Published 15 Nov 2021 in cs.CV

Abstract: An unsupervised, lightweight and high-performance single object tracker, called UHP-SOT, was proposed by Zhou et al. recently. As an extension, we present an enhanced version and name it UHP-SOT++ in this work. Built upon the foundation of the discriminative-correlation-filters-based (DCF-based) tracker, two new ingredients are introduced in UHP-SOT and UHP-SOT++: 1) background motion modeling and 2) object box trajectory modeling. The main difference between UHP-SOT and UHP-SOT++ is the fusion strategy of proposals from three models (i.e., DCF, background motion and object box trajectory models). An improved fusion strategy is adopted by UHP-SOT++ for more robust tracking performance against large-scale tracking datasets. Our second contribution lies in an extensive evaluation of the performance of state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised methods by testing them on four SOT benchmark datasets - OTB2015, TC128, UAV123 and LaSOT. Experiments show that UHP-SOT++ outperforms all previous unsupervised methods and several deep-learning (DL) methods in tracking accuracy. Since UHP-SOT++ has extremely small model size, high tracking performance, and low computational complexity (operating at a rate of 20 FPS on an i5 CPU even without code optimization), it is an ideal solution in real-time object tracking on resource-limited platforms. Based on the experimental results, we compare pros and cons of supervised and unsupervised trackers and provide a new perspective to understand the performance gap between supervised and unsupervised methods, which is the third contribution of this work.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.