Emergent Mind

Abstract

The fundamental sparsest cut problem takes as input a graph $G$ together with the edge costs and demands, and seeks a cut that minimizes the ratio between the costs and demands across the cuts. For $n$-node graphs~$G$ of treewidth~$k$, \chlamtac, Krauthgamer, and Raghavendra (APPROX 2010) presented an algorithm that yields a factor-$2{2k}$ approximation in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Later, Gupta, Talwar and Witmer (STOC 2013) showed how to obtain a $2$-approximation algorithm with a blown-up run time of $n{O(k)}$. An intriguing open question is whether one can simultaneously achieve the best out of the aforementioned results, that is, a factor-$2$ approximation in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. In this paper, we make significant progress towards this goal, via the following results: (i) A factor-$O(k2)$ approximation that runs in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, directly improving the work of Chlamt\'a\v{c} et al. while keeping the run time single-exponential in $k$. (ii) For any $\varepsilon>0$, a factor-$O(1/\varepsilon2)$ approximation whose run time is $2{O(k{1+\varepsilon}/\varepsilon)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, implying a constant-factor approximation whose run time is nearly single-exponential in $k$ and a factor-$O(\log2 k)$ approximation in time $k{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Key to these results is a new measure of a tree decomposition that we call combinatorial diameter, which may be of independent interest.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.