Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Approximating Sparsest Cut in Low-Treewidth Graphs via Combinatorial Diameter (2111.06299v1)

Published 11 Nov 2021 in cs.DS

Abstract: The fundamental sparsest cut problem takes as input a graph $G$ together with the edge costs and demands, and seeks a cut that minimizes the ratio between the costs and demands across the cuts. For $n$-node graphs~$G$ of treewidth~$k$, \chlamtac, Krauthgamer, and Raghavendra (APPROX 2010) presented an algorithm that yields a factor-$2{2k}$ approximation in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Later, Gupta, Talwar and Witmer (STOC 2013) showed how to obtain a $2$-approximation algorithm with a blown-up run time of $n{O(k)}$. An intriguing open question is whether one can simultaneously achieve the best out of the aforementioned results, that is, a factor-$2$ approximation in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. In this paper, we make significant progress towards this goal, via the following results: (i) A factor-$O(k2)$ approximation that runs in time $2{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, directly improving the work of Chlamt\'a\v{c} et al. while keeping the run time single-exponential in $k$. (ii) For any $\varepsilon>0$, a factor-$O(1/\varepsilon2)$ approximation whose run time is $2{O(k{1+\varepsilon}/\varepsilon)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, implying a constant-factor approximation whose run time is nearly single-exponential in $k$ and a factor-$O(\log2 k)$ approximation in time $k{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Key to these results is a new measure of a tree decomposition that we call combinatorial diameter, which may be of independent interest.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.