Emergent Mind

Long paths make pattern-counting hard, and deep trees make it harder

(2111.03479)
Published Nov 5, 2021 in cs.CC and cs.DM

Abstract

We study the counting problem known as #PPM, whose input is a pair of permutations $\pi$ and $\tau$ (called pattern and text, respectively), and the task is to find the number of subsequences of $\tau$ that have the same relative order as $\pi$. A simple brute-force approach solves #PPM for a pattern of length $k$ and a text of length $n$ in time $O(n{k+1})$, while Berendsohn, Kozma and Marx have recently shown that under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), it cannot be solved in time $f(k) n{o(k/\log k)}$ for any function $f$. In this paper, we consider the restriction of #PPM, known as $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM, where the pattern $\pi$ must belong to a hereditary permutation class $\mathcal{C}$. Our goal is to identify the structural properties of $\mathcal{C}$ that determine the complexity of $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM. We focus on two such structural properties, known as the long path property (LPP) and the deep tree property (DTP). Assuming ETH, we obtain these results: 1. If $C$ has the LPP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM cannot be solved in time $f(k)n{o(\sqrt{k})}$ for any function $f$, and 2. if $C$ has the DTP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM cannot be solved in time $f(k)n{o(k/\log2 k)}$ for any function $f$. Furthermore, when $\mathcal{C}$ is one of the so-called monotone grid classes, we show that if $\mathcal{C}$ has the LPP but not the DTP, then $\mathcal{C}$-Pattern #PPM can be solved in time $f(k)n{O(\sqrt k)}$. In particular, the lower bounds above are tight up to the polylog terms in the exponents.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.