Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Scale-Free Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandit with Arbitrary Feedback Delays (2110.13400v3)

Published 26 Oct 2021 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: We consider the Scale-Free Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem with unrestricted feedback delays. In contrast to the standard assumption that all losses are $[0,1]$-bounded, in our setting, losses can fall in a general bounded interval $[-L, L]$, unknown to the agent beforehand. Furthermore, the feedback of each arm pull can experience arbitrary delays. We propose a novel approach named Scale-Free Delayed INF (SFD-INF) for this novel setting, which combines a recent "convex combination trick" together with a novel doubling and skipping technique. We then present two instances of SFD-INF, each with carefully designed delay-adapted learning scales. The first one SFD-TINF uses $\frac 12$-Tsallis entropy regularizer and can achieve $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{K(D+T)}L)$ regret when the losses are non-negative, where $K$ is the number of actions, $T$ is the number of steps, and $D$ is the total feedback delay. This bound nearly matches the $\Omega((\sqrt{KT}+\sqrt{D\log K})L)$ lower-bound when regarding $K$ as a constant independent of $T$. The second one, SFD-LBINF, works for general scale-free losses and achieves a small-loss style adaptive regret bound $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{K\mathbb{E}[\tilde{\mathfrak L}_T2]}+\sqrt{KDL})$, which falls to the $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{K(D+T)}L)$ regret in the worst case and is thus more general than SFD-TINF despite a more complicated analysis and several extra logarithmic dependencies. Moreover, both instances also outperform the existing algorithms for non-delayed (i.e., $D=0$) scale-free adversarial MAB problems, which can be of independent interest.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.