Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Improved Analysis of EDCS via Gallai-Edmonds Decomposition (2110.05746v1)

Published 12 Oct 2021 in cs.DS

Abstract: In this note, we revisit the edge-degree constrained subgraph (EDCS) introduced by Bernstein and Stein (ICALP'15). An EDCS is a sparse subgraph satisfying simple edge-degree constraints that is guaranteed to include an (almost) $\frac{2}{3}$-approximate matching of the base graph. Since its introduction, the EDCS has been successfully applied to numerous models of computation. Motivated by this success, we revisit EDCS and present an improved bound for its key property in general graphs. Our main result is a new proof of the approximation guarantee of EDCS that builds on the graph's Gallai-Edmonds decomposition, avoiding the probabilistic method of the previous proofs. As a result, we get that to obtain a $(\frac{2}{3} - \epsilon)$-approximation, a sparse EDCS with maximum degree bounded by $O(1/\epsilon)$ is sufficient. This improves the $O(\log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon2)$ bound of Assadi and Bernstein (SOSA'19) and the $O(1/\epsilon3)$ bound of Bernstein and Stein (SODA'16). Our guarantee essentially matches what was previously only known for bipartite graphs, thereby removing the gap in our understanding of EDCS in general vs. bipartite graphs.

Citations (7)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)