Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Distributed $Δ$-Coloring Plays Hide-and-Seek (2110.00643v3)

Published 1 Oct 2021 in cs.DC

Abstract: We prove several new tight distributed lower bounds for classic symmetry breaking graph problems. As a basic tool, we first provide a new insightful proof that any deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a $\Delta$-coloring on $\Delta$-regular trees requires $\Omega(\log_\Delta n)$ rounds and any randomized algorithm requires $\Omega(\log_\Delta\log n)$ rounds. We prove this result by showing that a natural relaxation of the $\Delta$-coloring problem is a fixed point in the round elimination framework. As a first application, we show that our $\Delta$-coloring lower bound proof directly extends to arbdefective colorings. We exactly characterize which variants of the arbdefective coloring problem are "easy", and which of them instead are "hard". As a second application, which we see as our main contribution, we use the structure of the fixed point as a building block to prove lower bounds as a function of $\Delta$ for a large class of distributed symmetry breaking problems. For example, we obtain a tight lower bound for the fundamental problem of computing a $(2,\beta)$-ruling set. This is an exponential improvement over the best existing lower bound for the problem, which was proven in [FOCS '20]. Our lower bound even applies to a much more general family of problems that allows for almost arbitrary combinations of natural constraints from coloring problems, orientation problems, and independent set problems, and provides a single unified proof for known and new lower bound results for these types of problems. Our lower bounds as a function of $\Delta$ also imply lower bounds as a function of $n$. We obtain, for example, that maximal independent set, on trees, requires $\Omega(\log n / \log \log n)$ rounds for deterministic algorithms, which is tight.

Citations (18)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.