Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Finding Taint-Style Vulnerabilities in Linux-based Embedded Firmware with SSE-based Alias Analysis (2109.12209v1)

Published 24 Sep 2021 in cs.CR and cs.SE

Abstract: Although the importance of using static analysis to detect taint-style vulnerabilities in Linux-based embedded firmware is widely recognized, existing approaches are plagued by three major limitations. (a) Approaches based on symbolic execution may miss alias information and therefore suffer from a high false-negative rate. (b) Approaches based on VSA (value set analysis) often provide an over-approximate pointer range. As a result, many false positives could be produced. (c) Existing work for detecting taint-style vulnerability does not consider indirect call resolution, whereas indirect calls are frequently used in Internet-facing embedded devices. As a result, many false negatives could be produced. In this work, we propose a precise demand-driven flow-, context- and field-sensitive alias analysis approach. Based on this new approach, we also design a novel indirect call resolution scheme. Combined with sanitization rule checking, our solution discovers taint-style vulnerabilities by static taint analysis. We implemented our idea with a prototype called EmTaint and evaluated it against 35 real-world embedded firmware samples from six popular vendors. EmTaint discovered at least 192 bugs, including 41 n-day bugs and 151 0-day bugs. At least 115 CVE/PSV numbers have been allocated from a subset of the reported vulnerabilities at the time of writing. Compared to state-of-the-art tools such as KARONTE and SaTC, EmTaint found significantly more bugs on the same dataset in less time.

Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.