Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 56 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 155 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 476 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Recommending Extract Method Refactoring Based on Confidence of Predicted Method Name (2108.11011v2)

Published 25 Aug 2021 in cs.SE

Abstract: Refactoring is an important activity that is frequently performed in software development, and among them, Extract Method is known to be one of the most frequently performed refactorings. The existing techniques for recommending Extract Method refactoring calculate metrics from the source method and the code fragments to be extracted to order the recommendation candidates. This paper proposes a new technique for accurately recommending Extract Method refactoring by considering whether code fragments are semantically coherent chunks that can be given clear method names, in addition to the metrics used in previous studies. As a criterion for the semantic coherency, the proposed technique employs the probability (i.e. confidence) of the predicted method names for the code fragments output by code2seq, which is a state-of-the-art method name prediction technique. The evaluation experiment confirmed that the proposed technique has higher correctness of recommendation than the existing techniques.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.