- The paper presents a benchmark framework comparing various techniques to improve the training stability and accuracy of deep GNNs.
- It analyzes skip connections, graph normalization, dropout methods, and identity mapping to address over-smoothing, vanishing gradients, and other challenges.
- The study reveals that combining initial connection, identity mapping, group and batch normalization achieves state-of-the-art results on large graph datasets.
An Evaluation of Techniques for Training Deep Graph Neural Networks
In the domain of graph neural networks (GNNs), training deeper models presents significant difficulties that are distinct from other neural network architectures. This includes challenges such as vanishing gradients, overfitting, over-smoothing, and the information squashing phenomenon. Several techniques, collectively referred to as "tricks," have been proposed to address these issues, yet quantifying their effectiveness is complicated by the lack of a standardized benchmarking framework with consistent experimental settings.
This paper presents a structured and reproducible benchmark for evaluating the training methods used in deep GNNs, thus isolating the benefits conferred by deeper architectures from those provided by training aids. Researchers categorized existing strategies, assessed their sensitivity to hyperparameters, and unified experimental setups to mitigate variance in results due to inconsistent conditions. They conducted a comprehensive evaluation of these techniques across numerous graph datasets, including the expansive Open Graph Benchmark, using various deep GNN architectures.
The analysis covered several principal training methods:
- Skip Connections: Four types of skip connections (residual, initial, dense, and jumping connections) were evaluated on their ability to enhance training effectiveness, particularly on large-scale datasets.
- Graph Normalization: Techniques like batch normalization, pair normalization, node normalization, mean normalization, and group normalization were explored, focusing on their potential to alleviate over-smoothing.
- Random Dropping: The impact of dropout techniques, including DropEdge, DropNode, and node sampling methods like LADIES, was investigated as a means to combat over-smoothing.
- Identity Mapping: This technique was also considered for its capacity to prevent overfitting and improve training stability in deep GNNs.
The paper reports that the combination of multiple training methods leads to significant improvements in accuracy and training stability for deep GNNs. Notably, an amalgam of initial connection, identity mapping, group normalization, and batch normalization achieves state-of-the-art results on large datasets. Furthermore, it was observed that the effectiveness of these techniques can vary with the size of the dataset and the specific GNN architecture used, demonstrating the importance of customized model training strategies.
The findings are significant for both theoretical and practical advancements in GNNs. They provide a clear framework for improving the depth and performance of GNNs, highlighting the necessity of using cohesive and synergistic training strategies. Moreover, this benchmark can serve as a foundational resource for future developments, helping to inform more effective architecture designs and training methodologies in the field of graph-based learning. Potential future developments may include extending this analysis to newer architectures and different types of graph data, thereby broadening the impact and applicability of the results.