Emergent Mind

Using Uncertainty in Deep Learning Reconstruction for Cone-Beam CT of the Brain

(2108.09229)
Published Aug 20, 2021 in physics.med-ph and eess.IV

Abstract

Contrast resolution beyond the limits of conventional cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems is essential to high-quality imaging of the brain. We present a deep learning reconstruction method (dubbed DL-Recon) that integrates physically principled reconstruction models with DL-based image synthesis based on the statistical uncertainty in the synthesis image. A synthesis network was developed to generate a synthesized CBCT image (DL-Synthesis) from an uncorrected filtered back-projection (FBP) image. To improve generalizability (including accurate representation of lesions not seen in training), voxel-wise epistemic uncertainty of DL-Synthesis was computed using a Bayesian inference technique (Monte-Carlo dropout). In regions of high uncertainty, the DL-Recon method incorporates information from a physics-based reconstruction model and artifact-corrected projection data. Two forms of the DL-Recon method are proposed: (i) image-domain fusion of DL-Synthesis and FBP (DL-FBP) weighted by DL uncertainty; and (ii) a model-based iterative image reconstruction (MBIR) optimization using DL-Synthesis to compute a spatially varying regularization term based on DL uncertainty (DL-MBIR). The error in DL-Synthesis images was correlated with the uncertainty in the synthesis estimate. Compared to FBP and PWLS, the DL-Recon methods (both DL-FBP and DL-MBIR) showed ~50% reduction in noise (at matched spatial resolution) and ~40-70% improvement in image uniformity. Conventional DL-Synthesis alone exhibited ~10-60% under-estimation of lesion contrast and ~5-40% reduction in lesion segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient) in simulated and real brain lesions, suggesting a lack of reliability / generalizability for structures unseen in the training data. DL-FBP and DL-MBIR improved the accuracy of reconstruction by directly incorporating information from the measurements in regions of high uncertainty.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.