Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Using Uncertainty in Deep Learning Reconstruction for Cone-Beam CT of the Brain (2108.09229v1)

Published 20 Aug 2021 in physics.med-ph and eess.IV

Abstract: Contrast resolution beyond the limits of conventional cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems is essential to high-quality imaging of the brain. We present a deep learning reconstruction method (dubbed DL-Recon) that integrates physically principled reconstruction models with DL-based image synthesis based on the statistical uncertainty in the synthesis image. A synthesis network was developed to generate a synthesized CBCT image (DL-Synthesis) from an uncorrected filtered back-projection (FBP) image. To improve generalizability (including accurate representation of lesions not seen in training), voxel-wise epistemic uncertainty of DL-Synthesis was computed using a Bayesian inference technique (Monte-Carlo dropout). In regions of high uncertainty, the DL-Recon method incorporates information from a physics-based reconstruction model and artifact-corrected projection data. Two forms of the DL-Recon method are proposed: (i) image-domain fusion of DL-Synthesis and FBP (DL-FBP) weighted by DL uncertainty; and (ii) a model-based iterative image reconstruction (MBIR) optimization using DL-Synthesis to compute a spatially varying regularization term based on DL uncertainty (DL-MBIR). The error in DL-Synthesis images was correlated with the uncertainty in the synthesis estimate. Compared to FBP and PWLS, the DL-Recon methods (both DL-FBP and DL-MBIR) showed ~50% reduction in noise (at matched spatial resolution) and ~40-70% improvement in image uniformity. Conventional DL-Synthesis alone exhibited ~10-60% under-estimation of lesion contrast and ~5-40% reduction in lesion segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient) in simulated and real brain lesions, suggesting a lack of reliability / generalizability for structures unseen in the training data. DL-FBP and DL-MBIR improved the accuracy of reconstruction by directly incorporating information from the measurements in regions of high uncertainty.

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.