Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 34 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 80 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 461 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Two-Pass Lower Bound for Semi-Streaming Maximum Matching (2108.07187v1)

Published 16 Aug 2021 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: We prove a lower bound on the space complexity of two-pass semi-streaming algorithms that approximate the maximum matching problem. The lower bound is parameterized by the density of Ruzsa-Szemeredi graphs: * Any two-pass semi-streaming algorithm for maximum matching has approximation ratio at least $(1- \Omega(\frac{\log{RS(n)}}{\log{n}}))$, where $RS(n)$ denotes the maximum number of induced matchings of size $\Theta(n)$ in any $n$-vertex graph, i.e., the largest density of a Ruzsa-Szemeredi graph. Currently, it is known that $n{\Omega(1/!\log\log{n})} \leq RS(n) \leq \frac{n}{2{O(\log*{!(n)})}}$ and closing this (large) gap between upper and lower bounds has remained a notoriously difficult problem in combinatorics. Under the plausible hypothesis that $RS(n) = n{\Omega(1)}$, our lower bound is the first to rule out small-constant approximation two-pass semi-streaming algorithms for the maximum matching problem, making progress on a longstanding open question in the graph streaming literature.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)