Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 31 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 9 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Evaluation of distortion correction methods in diffusion MRI of the spinal cord (2108.03817v1)

Published 9 Aug 2021 in eess.IV and physics.med-ph

Abstract: Background: Magnetic field inhomogeneities generate important geometric distortions in reconstructed echo-planar images. Various procedures were proposed for correcting these distortions on brain images; yet, few neuroimaging studies tailored and incorporated the use of these techniques in spinal cord diffusion MRI. Purpose: We present a comparative evaluation of distortion correction methods that use the reversed gradient polarity technique on spinal cord. We propose novel geometric metrics to measure the alignment of the reconstructed diffusion model with the apparent centerline of the spinal cord. Subjects: 95 subjects, among which 29 healthy controls and 66 multiple sclerosis patients. Assessment: Geometric distortions were corrected using 4 state-of-the-art methods. We measured the alignment of the principal direction of diffusion with the apparent centerline of the spine after correction and the correlation with the reference anatomical image. Results are computed per vertebral level, to evaluate the impact on different portions of the spine. Besides, subjective evaluation of the quality of the correction of healthy subjects images was performed by three expert raters. Results: As a result of distortion correction, the diffusion directions are better aligned locally with the centerline, in particular at both ends of the acquisition window. The cross-correlation with anatomical image is also improved by Hyperelastic Susceptibility Artefact Correction (HySCO) and block-matching. The subjective evaluation for HySCO is significantly better (p < 0.05) than for Block-Matching; TOPUP performs significantly worse than the three other methods. Conclusion: Correction based on HySCO provide best results among the selected methods.

Citations (23)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.