Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 143 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 117 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 436 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Functional lower bounds for restricted arithmetic circuits of depth four (2107.09703v1)

Published 20 Jul 2021 in cs.CC

Abstract: Recently, Forbes, Kumar and Saptharishi [CCC, 2016] proved that there exists an explicit $d{O(1)}$-variate and degree $d$ polynomial $P_{d}\in VNP$ such that if any depth four circuit $C$ of bounded formal degree $d$ which computes a polynomial of bounded individual degree $O(1)$, that is functionally equivalent to $P_d$, then $C$ must have size $2{\Omega(\sqrt{d}\log{d})}$. The motivation for their work comes from Boolean Circuit Complexity. Based on a characterization for $ACC0$ circuits by Yao [FOCS, 1985] and Beigel and Tarui [CC, 1994], Forbes, Kumar and Saptharishi [CCC, 2016] observed that functions in $ACC0$ can also be computed by algebraic $\Sigma\mathord{\wedge}\Sigma\Pi$ circuits (i.e., circuits of the form -- sums of powers of polynomials) of $2{\log{O(1)}n}$ size. Thus they argued that a $2{\omega(\log{O(1)}{n})}$ "functional" lower bound for an explicit polynomial $Q$ against $\Sigma\mathord{\wedge}\Sigma\Pi$ circuits would imply a lower bound for the "corresponding Boolean function" of $Q$ against non-uniform $ACC0$. In their work, they ask if their lower bound be extended to $\Sigma\mathord{\wedge}\Sigma\Pi$ circuits. In this paper, for large integers $n$ and $d$ such that $\omega(\log2n)\leq d\leq n{0.01}$, we show that any $\Sigma\mathord{\wedge}\Sigma\Pi$ circuit of bounded individual degree at most $O\left(\frac{d}{k2}\right)$ that functionally computes Iterated Matrix Multiplication polynomial $IMM_{n,d}$ ($\in VP$) over ${0,1}{n2d}$ must have size $n{\Omega(k)}$. Since Iterated Matrix Multiplication $IMM_{n,d}$ over ${0,1}{n2d}$ is functionally in $GapL$, improvement of the afore mentioned lower bound to hold for quasipolynomially large values of individual degree would imply a fine-grained separation of $ACC0$ from $GapL$.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.