Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Based Maximum Likelihood Detection (2107.05020v1)

Published 11 Jul 2021 in cs.IT, math.IT, and quant-ph

Abstract: Recent advances in quantum technologies pave the way for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, where quantum approximation optimization algorithms (QAOAs) constitute promising candidates for demonstrating tangible quantum advantages based on NISQ devices. In this paper, we consider the maximum likelihood (ML) detection problem of binary symbols transmitted over a multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) channel, where finding the optimal solution is exponentially hard using classical computers. Here, we apply the QAOA for the ML detection by encoding the problem of interest into a level-p QAOA circuit having 2p variational parameters, which can be optimized by classical optimizers. This level-p QAOA circuit is constructed by applying the prepared Hamiltonian to our problem and the initial Hamiltonian alternately in p consecutive rounds. More explicitly, we first encode the optimal solution of the ML detection problem into the ground state of a problem Hamiltonian. Using the quantum adiabatic evolution technique, we provide both analytical and numerical results for characterizing the evolution of the eigenvalues of the quantum system used for ML detection. Then, for level-1 QAOA circuits, we derive the analytical expressions of the expectation values of the QAOA and discuss the complexity of the QAOA based ML detector. Explicitly, we evaluate the computational complexity of the classical optimizer used and the storage requirement of simulating the QAOA. Finally, we evaluate the bit error rate (BER) of the QAOA based ML detector and compare it both to the classical ML detector and to the classical MMSE detector, demonstrating that the QAOA based ML detector is capable of approaching the performance of the classical ML detector. This paves the way for a host of large-scale classical optimization problems to be solved by NISQ computers.

Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.