Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Measuring Information Leakage in Non-stochastic Brute-Force Guessing

Published 2 Jul 2021 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2107.01113v1)

Abstract: This paper proposes an operational measure of non-stochastic information leakage to formalize privacy against a brute-force guessing adversary. The information is measured by non-probabilistic uncertainty of uncertain variables, the non-stochastic counterparts of random variables. For XX that is related to released data YY, the non-stochastic brute-force leakage is measured by the complexity of exhaustively checking all the possibilities of the private attribute UU of XX by an adversary. The complexity refers to the number of trials to successfully guess UU. Maximizing this leakage over all possible private attributes UU gives rise to the maximal (i.e., worst-case) non-stochastic brute-force guessing leakage. This is proved to be fully determined by the minimal non-stochastic uncertainty of XX given YY, which also determines the worst-case attribute UU indicating the highest privacy risk if YY is disclosed. The maximal non-stochastic brute-force guessing leakage is shown to be proportional to the non-stochastic identifiability of XX given YY and upper bounds the existing maximin information. The latter quantifies the information leakage when an adversary must perfectly guess UU in one-shot via YY. Experiments are used to demonstrate the tradeoff between the maximal non-stochastic brute-force guessing leakage and the data utility (measured by the maximum quantization error) and to illustrate the relationship between maximin information and stochastic one-shot maximal leakage.

Authors (2)
Citations (10)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.