Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 42 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A cubic vertex-kernel for Trivially Perfect Editing (2105.08549v1)

Published 18 May 2021 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: We consider the Trivially Perfect Editing problem, where one is given an undirected graph $G = (V,E)$ and a parameter $k \in \mathbb{N}$ and seeks to edit (add or delete) at most $k$ edges from $G$ to obtain a trivially perfect graph. The related Trivially Perfect Completion and Trivially Perfect Deletion problems are obtained by only allowing edge additions or edge deletions, respectively. Trivially perfect graphs are both chordal and cographs, and have applications related to the tree-depth width parameter and to social network analysis. All variants of the problem are known to be NP-Complete and to admit so-called polynomial kernels. More precisely, the existence of an $O(k3)$ vertex-kernel for Trivially Perfect Completion was announced by Guo (ISAAC 2007) but without a stand-alone proof. More recently, Drange and Pilipczuk (Algorithmica 2018) provided $O(k7)$ vertex-kernels for these problems and left open the existence of cubic vertex-kernels. In this work, we answer positively to this question for all three variants of the problem.

Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.