Minimum Stable Cut and Treewidth

Abstract: A stable or locally-optimal cut of a graph is a cut whose weight cannot be increased by changing the side of a single vertex. In this paper we study Minimum Stable Cut, the problem of finding a stable cut of minimum weight. Since this problem is NP-hard, we study its complexity on graphs of low treewidth, low degree, or both. We begin by showing that the problem remains weakly NP-hard on severely restricted trees, so bounding treewidth alone cannot make it tractable. We match this hardness with a pseudo-polynomial DP algorithm solving the problem in time $(\Delta\cdot W)<sup>{O(tw)}n<sup>{O(1)}$, where $tw$ is the treewidth, $\Delta$ the maximum degree, and $W$ the maximum weight. On the other hand, bounding $\Delta$ is also not enough, as the problem is NP-hard for unweighted graphs of bounded degree. We therefore parameterize Minimum Stable Cut by both $tw$ and $\Delta$ and obtain an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{O(\Delta tw)}(n+\log W)<sup>{O(1)}$. Our main result for the weighted problem is to provide a reduction showing that both aforementioned algorithms are essentially optimal, even if we replace treewidth by pathwidth: if there exists an algorithm running in $(nW)<sup>{o(pw)}$ or $2^{o(\Delta pw)}(n+\log W)<sup>{O(1)}$, then the ETH is false. Complementing this, we show that we can, however, obtain an FPT approximation scheme parameterized by treewidth, if we consider almost-stable solutions, that is, solutions where no single vertex can unilaterally increase the weight of its incident cut edges by more than a factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$. Motivated by these mostly negative results, we consider Unweighted Minimum Stable Cut. Here our results already imply a much faster exact algorithm running in time $\Delta<sup>{O(tw)}n<sup>{O(1)}$. We show that this is also probably essentially optimal: an algorithm running in $n<sup>{o(pw)}$ would contradict the ETH.