Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 138 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficient Preconditioners for Interior Point Methods via a new Schur Complement-Based Strategy (2104.12916v3)

Published 27 Apr 2021 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: We propose a novel preconditioned inexact primal-dual interior point method for constrained convex quadratic programming problems. The algorithm we describe invokes the preconditioned conjugate gradient method on a new reduced Schur complement KKT system, in implicit form. In contrast to standard approaches, the Schur complement formulation we consider enables reuse of the factorization of the KKT matrix with rows and columns corresponding to inequality constraints excluded, across all interior point iterations. Further, two new preconditioners are presented for the resulting reduced system, that alleviate the ill-conditioning associated with slack variables in primal-dual interior point methods. Each of the preconditioners we propose also provably reduces the number of unique eigenvalues for the coefficient matrix, and thus the CG iteration count. One preconditioner is efficient when the number of equality constraints is small, while the other is efficient when the number of remaining degrees of freedom is small. Numerical experiments with synthetic problems and problems from the Maros-M\'esz\'aros QP collection show that our preconditioned inexact interior point solvers are effective at improving conditioning and reducing cost. Across all test problems for which the direct method is not fastest, our preconditioned methods achieve a reduction in cost by a geometric mean of $1.432$ relative to the best alternative preconditioned method for each problem.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.