Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 143 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 85 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

RA-BNN: Constructing Robust & Accurate Binary Neural Network to Simultaneously Defend Adversarial Bit-Flip Attack and Improve Accuracy (2103.13813v1)

Published 22 Mar 2021 in cs.LG, cs.CR, cs.CV, and eess.IV

Abstract: Recently developed adversarial weight attack, a.k.a. bit-flip attack (BFA), has shown enormous success in compromising Deep Neural Network (DNN) performance with an extremely small amount of model parameter perturbation. To defend against this threat, we propose RA-BNN that adopts a complete binary (i.e., for both weights and activation) neural network (BNN) to significantly improve DNN model robustness (defined as the number of bit-flips required to degrade the accuracy to as low as a random guess). However, such an aggressive low bit-width model suffers from poor clean (i.e., no attack) inference accuracy. To counter this, we propose a novel and efficient two-stage network growing method, named Early-Growth. It selectively grows the channel size of each BNN layer based on channel-wise binary masks training with Gumbel-Sigmoid function. Apart from recovering the inference accuracy, our RA-BNN after growing also shows significantly higher resistance to BFA. Our evaluation of the CIFAR-10 dataset shows that the proposed RA-BNN can improve the clean model accuracy by ~2-8 %, compared with a baseline BNN, while simultaneously improving the resistance to BFA by more than 125 x. Moreover, on ImageNet, with a sufficiently large (e.g., 5,000) amount of bit-flips, the baseline BNN accuracy drops to 4.3 % from 51.9 %, while our RA-BNN accuracy only drops to 37.1 % from 60.9 % (9 % clean accuracy improvement).

Citations (23)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.