Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Centralized and Distributed Intrusion Detection for Resource Constrained Wireless SDN Networks (2103.01262v1)

Published 1 Mar 2021 in cs.CR and eess.SP

Abstract: Software-defined networking (SDN) was devised to simplify network management and automate infrastructure sharing in wired networks. These benefits motivated the application of SDN in wireless sensor networks to leverage solutions for complex applications. However, some of the core SDN traits turn the networks prone to denial of service attacks (DoS). There are proposals in the literature to detect DoS in wireless SDN networks, however, not without shortcomings: there is little focus on resource constraints, high detection rates have been reported only for small networks, and the detection is disengaged from the identification of the type of the attack or the attacker. Our work targets these shortcomings by introducing a lightweight, online change point detector to monitor performance metrics that are impacted when the network is under attack. A key novelty is that the proposed detector is able to operate in either centralized or distributed mode. The centralized detector has very high detection rates and can further distinguish the type of the attack (from a list of known attacks). On the other hand, the distributed detector provides information that allows to identify the nodes launching the attack. Our proposal is tested over IEEE 802.15.4 networks. The results show detection rates exceeding $96\%$ in networks of 36 and 100 nodes and identification of the type of the attack with a probability exceeding $0.89$ when using the centralized approach. Additionally, for some types of attack it was possible to pinpoint the attackers with an identification probability over $0.93$ when using distributed detectors.

Citations (21)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube