Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Unifying the Global and Local Approaches: An Efficient Power Iteration with Forward Push (2101.03652v2)

Published 11 Jan 2021 in cs.DS

Abstract: Personalized PageRank (PPR) is a critical measure of the importance of a node t to a source node s in a graph. The Single-Source PPR (SSPPR) query computes the PPR's of all the nodes with respect to s on a directed graph $G$ with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges, and it is an essential operation widely used in graph applications. In this paper, we propose novel algorithms for solving two variants of SSPPR: (i) high-precision queries and (ii) approximate queries. For high-precision queries, Power Iteration (PowItr) and Forward Push (FwdPush) are two fundamental approaches. Given an absolute error threshold $\lambda$, the only known bound of FwdPush is $O(\frac{m}{\lambda})$, much worse than the $O(m \log \frac{1}{\lambda})$-bound of PowItr. Whether FwdPush can achieve the same running time bound as PowItr does still remains an open question in the research community. We give a positive answer to this question by showing that the running time of a common implementation of FwdPush is actually bounded by $O(m \cdot \log \frac{1}{\lambda})$.Based on this finding, we propose a new algorithm, called Power Iteration with Forward Push (PowerPush), which incorporates the strengths of both PowItr and FwdPush. For approximate queries (with a relative error $\epsilon$), we propose a new algorithm, called SpeedPPR, with overall expected time bounded by $O(n \cdot \log n \cdot \log \frac{1}{\epsilon})$ on scale-free graphs. This bound greatly improves the $O(\frac{n \cdot \log n}{\epsilon})$ bound of a state-of-the-art algorithm FORA.

Citations (44)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.