Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Query Complexity of Local Search and Brouwer in Rounds (2101.00061v2)

Published 31 Dec 2020 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: We consider the query complexity of finding a local minimum of a function defined on a graph, where at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the oracle are allowed. Rounds model parallel settings, where each query takes resources to complete and is executed on a separate processor. Thus the query complexity in $k$ rounds informs how many processors are needed to achieve a parallel time of $k$. We focus on the d-dimensional grid $[n]d$, where the dimension $d$ is a constant, and consider two regimes for the number of rounds: constant and polynomial in n. We give algorithms and lower bounds that characterize the trade-off between the number of rounds of adaptivity and the query complexity of local search. When the number of rounds $k$ is constant, we show that the query complexity of local search in $k$ rounds is $\Theta\bigl(n{\frac{d{k+1} - dk}{dk - 1}}\bigl)$, for both deterministic and randomized algorithms. When the number of rounds is polynomial, i.e. $k = n{\alpha}$ for $0 < \alpha < d/2$, the randomized query complexity is $\Theta\left(n{d-1 - \frac{d-2}{d}\alpha}\right)$ for all $d \geq 5$. For $d=3$ and $d=4$, we show the same upper bound expression holds and give almost matching lower bounds. The local search analysis also enables us to characterize the query complexity of computing a Brouwer fixed point in rounds. Our proof technique for lower bounding the query complexity in rounds may be of independent interest as an alternative to the classical relational adversary method of Aaronson from the fully adaptive setting.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Simina Brânzei (34 papers)
  2. Jiawei Li (116 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.