Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Lower Bounds for Semialgebraic Range Searching and Stabbing Problems (2012.00704v3)

Published 1 Dec 2020 in cs.CG

Abstract: In the semialgebraic range searching problem, we are to preprocess $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}d$ s.t. for any query range from a family of constant complexity semialgebraic sets, all the points intersecting the range can be reported or counted efficiently. When the ranges are composed of simplices, the problem can be solved using $S(n)$ space and with $Q(n)$ query time with $S(n)Qd(n) = \tilde{O}(nd)$ and this trade-off is almost tight. Consequently, there exists low space structures that use $\tilde{O}(n)$ space with $O(n{1-1/d})$ query time and fast query structures that use $O(nd)$ space with $O(\log{d} n)$ query time. However, for the general semialgebraic ranges, only low space solutions are known, but the best solutions match the same trade-off curve as the simplex queries. It has been conjectured that the same could be done for the fast query case but this open problem has stayed unresolved. Here, we disprove this conjecture. We give the first nontrivial lower bounds for semilagebraic range searching and related problems. We show that any data structure for reporting the points between two concentric circles with $Q(n)$ query time must use $S(n)=\Omega(n{3-o(1)}/Q(n)5)$ space, meaning, for $Q(n)=O(\log{O(1)}n)$, $\Omega(n{3-o(1)})$ space must be used. We also study the problem of reporting the points between two polynomials of form $Y=\sum_{i=0}\Delta a_i Xi$ where $a_0, \cdots, a_\Delta$ are given at the query time. We show $S(n)=\Omega(n{\Delta+1-o(1)}/Q(n){\Delta2+\Delta})$. So for $Q(n)=O(\log{O(1)}n)$, we must use $\Omega(n{\Delta+1-o(1)})$ space. For the dual semialgebraic stabbing problems, we show that in linear space, any data structure that solves 2D ring stabbing must use $\Omega(n{2/3})$ query time. This almost matches the linearization upper bound. For general semialgebraic slab stabbing problems, again, we show an almost tight lower bounds.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Peyman Afshani (25 papers)
  2. Pingan Cheng (8 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.