Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Hop-Constrained Oblivious Routing

Published 20 Nov 2020 in cs.DS | (2011.10446v2)

Abstract: We prove the existence of an oblivious routing scheme that is poly(logn)\mathrm{poly}(\log n)-competitive in terms of (congestion+dilation)(congestion + dilation), thus resolving a well-known question in oblivious routing. Concretely, consider an undirected network and a set of packets each with its own source and destination. The objective is to choose a path for each packet, from its source to its destination, so as to minimize (congestion+dilation)(congestion + dilation), defined as follows: The dilation is the maximum path hop-length, and the congestion is the maximum number of paths that include any single edge. The routing scheme obliviously and randomly selects a path for each packet independent of (the existence of) the other packets. Despite this obliviousness, the selected paths have (congestion+dilation)(congestion + dilation) within a poly(logn)\mathrm{poly}(\log n) factor of the best possible value. More precisely, for any integer hop-bound hh, this oblivious routing scheme selects paths of length at most hpoly(logn)h \cdot \mathrm{poly}(\log n) and is poly(logn)\mathrm{poly}(\log n)-competitive in terms of congestioncongestion in comparison to the best possible congestioncongestion achievable via paths of length at most hh hops. These paths can be sampled in polynomial time. This result can be viewed as an analogue of the celebrated oblivious routing results of R\"{a}cke [FOCS 2002, STOC 2008], which are O(logn)O(\log n)-competitive in terms of congestioncongestion, but are not competitive in terms of dilationdilation.

Citations (22)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.