Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 148 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Tight Distributed Listing of Cliques (2011.07405v1)

Published 14 Nov 2020 in cs.DC

Abstract: Much progress has recently been made in understanding the complexity landscape of subgraph finding problems in the CONGEST model of distributed computing. However, so far, very few tight bounds are known in this area. For triangle (i.e., 3-clique) listing, an optimal $\tilde{O}(n{1/3})$-round distributed algorithm has been constructed by Chang et al.~[SODA 2019, PODC 2019]. Recent works of Eden et al.~[DISC 2019] and of Censor-Hillel et al.~[PODC 2020] have shown sublinear algorithms for $K_p$-listing, for each $p \geq 4$, but still leaving a significant gap between the upper bounds and the known lower bounds of the problem. In this paper, we completely close this gap. We show that for each $p \geq 4$, there is an $\tilde{O}(n{1 - 2/p})$-round distributed algorithm that lists all $p$-cliques $K_p$ in the communication network. Our algorithm is \emph{optimal} up to a polylogarithmic factor, due to the $\tilde{\Omega}(n{1 - 2/p})$-round lower bound of Fischer et al.~[SPAA 2018], which holds even in the CONGESTED CLIQUE model. Together with the triangle-listing algorithm by Chang et al.~[SODA 2019, PODC 2019], our result thus shows that the round complexity of $K_p$-listing, for all $p$, is the same in both the CONGEST and CONGESTED CLIQUE models, at $\tilde{\Theta}(n{1 - 2/p})$ rounds. For $p=4$, our result additionally matches the $\tilde{\Omega}(n{1/2})$ lower bound for $K_4$-\emph{detection} by Czumaj and Konrad [DISC 2018], implying that the round complexities for detection and listing of $K_4$ are equivalent in the CONGEST model.

Citations (20)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.