Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

FPT-Algorithms for the \ell-Matchoid Problem with a Coverage Objective (2011.06268v3)

Published 12 Nov 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: We consider the problem of optimizing a coverage function under a $\ell$-matchoid of rank $k$. We design fixed-parameter algorithms as well as streaming algorithms to compute an exact solution. Unlike previous work that presumes linear representativity of matroids, we consider the general oracle model. For the special case where the coverage function is linear, we give a deterministic fixed-parameter algorithm parameterized by $\ell$ and $k$. This result, combined with the lower bounds of Lovasz, and Jensen and Korte demonstrates a separation between the $\ell$-matchoid and the matroid $\ell$-parity problems in the setting of fixed-parameter tractability. For a general coverage function, we give both deterministic and randomized fixed-parameter algorithms, parameterized by $\ell$ and $z$, where $z$ is the number of points covered in an optimal solution. The resulting algorithms can be directly translated into streaming algorithms. For unweighted coverage functions, we show that we can find an exact solution even when the function is given in the form of a value oracle (and so we do not have access to an explicit representation of the set system). Our result can be implemented in the streaming setting and stores a number of elements depending only on $\ell$ and $z$, but completely indpendent of the total size $n$ of the ground set. This shows that it is possible to circumvent the recent space lower bound of Feldman et al, by parameterizing the solution value. This result, combined with existing lower bounds, also provides a new separation between the space and time complexity of maximizing an arbitrary submodular function and a coverage function in the value oracle model.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.