Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 56 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 155 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 476 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Approximating the Weighted Minimum Label $s$-$t$ Cut Problem (2011.06204v1)

Published 12 Nov 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: In the weighted (minimum) {\sf Label $s$-$t$ Cut} problem, we are given a (directed or undirected) graph $G=(V,E)$, a label set $L = {\ell_1, \ell_2, \dots, \ell_q }$ with positive label weights ${w_\ell}$, a source $s \in V$ and a sink $t \in V$. Each edge edge $e$ of $G$ has a label $\ell(e)$ from $L$. Different edges may have the same label. The problem asks to find a minimum weight label subset $L'$ such that the removal of all edges with labels in $L'$ disconnects $s$ and $t$. The unweighted {\sf Label $s$-$t$ Cut} problem (i.e., every label has a unit weight) can be approximated within $O(n{2/3})$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of graph $G$. However, it is unknown for a long time how to approximate the weighted {\sf Label $s$-$t$ Cut} problem within $o(n)$. In this paper, we provide an approximation algorithm for the weighted {\sf Label $s$-$t$ Cut} problem with ratio $O(n{2/3})$. The key point of the algorithm is a mechanism to interpret label weight on an edge as both its length and capacity.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)