Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Syntactic Approach to Studying Strongly Equivalent Logic Programs (2011.04454v3)

Published 9 Nov 2020 in cs.LO

Abstract: In the field of Answer Set Programming (ASP), two logic programs are strongly equivalent if they are ordinarily equivalent under any extensions. This property provides a theoretical foundation for studying many aspects of logic programs such as program simplification and transformation etc. Therefore, strong equivalence has been investigated extensively for ASP and its extensions such as LPMLN. In this paper, we present a syntactic approach to studying the strong equivalence of logic programs, which provides several interesting results and would help us understand the strong equivalence from a new perspective. Firstly, we present the notions of independent sets and five kinds of syntactic transformations (S-* transformations) for logic programs. And we investigate the strong equivalence (SE) and non-strong equivalence (NSE) preserving properties of the S-* transformations in the contexts of ASP and LPMLN. Secondly, based on the properties of the S-* transformations, we present a fully automatic algorithm to discover syntactic conditions that preserve strong equivalences (SE-conditions) of ASP and LPMLN programs. To discover the SE-conditions efficiently, we present four kinds of approaches to improve the algorithm. Thirdly, we present a preliminary method to simplify the discovered SE-conditions and report the simplified SE-conditions of several kinds of LPMLN programs. After that, we present a discussion on the discovered SE-conditions and some existing problems. Finally, we present a comparison between SE-conditions discovering approaches in this paper and in the related work.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Zhizheng Zhang (60 papers)
  2. Shutao Zhang (14 papers)
  3. Yanghe Feng (18 papers)
  4. Bin Wang (751 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.