Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation (2011.02593v3)

Published 5 Nov 2020 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Neural sequence models can generate highly fluent sentences, but recent studies have also shown that they are also prone to hallucinate additional content not supported by the input. These variety of fluent but wrong outputs are particularly problematic, as it will not be possible for users to tell they are being presented incorrect content. To detect these errors, we propose a task to predict whether each token in the output sequence is hallucinated (not contained in the input) and collect new manually annotated evaluation sets for this task. We also introduce a method for learning to detect hallucinations using pretrained LLMs fine tuned on synthetic data that includes automatically inserted hallucinations Experiments on machine translation (MT) and abstractive summarization demonstrate that our proposed approach consistently outperforms strong baselines on all benchmark datasets. We further demonstrate how to use the token-level hallucination labels to define a fine-grained loss over the target sequence in low-resource MT and achieve significant improvements over strong baseline methods. We also apply our method to word-level quality estimation for MT and show its effectiveness in both supervised and unsupervised settings. Codes and data available at https://github.com/violet-zct/fairseq-detect-hallucination.

Citations (177)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a token-level framework that detects unfaithful content in generated sequences.
  • It leverages manually annotated and synthetic datasets, achieving an average F1 score of around 0.6 in machine translation benchmarks.
  • By integrating hallucination labels into training, the approach enhances model reliability and translation quality, particularly in low-resource settings.

Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation

The paper "Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation" addresses the persistent issue of hallucinations in neural sequence models. Hallucinations, defined as fluent but incorrect content that isn't supported by the input data, pose significant challenges in applications like machine translation (MT) and abstractive summarization. These challenges are critical since users may be unaware of the inaccuracy in the information presented, leading to misinformation.

Methodology and Results

The authors propose a novel framework to detect token-level hallucinations. The core idea is to predict whether each token in an output sequence is hallucinated. To facilitate this, the authors assembled manually annotated datasets specifically for this task, focusing on MT and abstractive summarization.

The methodology hinges on training models to identify hallucinations using synthetic datasets enriched with artificial hallucinations. They utilize pretrained LLMs, fine-tuned with data embedded with automatically generated hallucinations, to detect unfaithful content.

Experiments across various benchmark datasets reveal that the proposed approach surpasses existing strong baselines. For instance, in MT, evaluations showed significant improvements in detecting and labeling hallucinated tokens, with an average F1 score of around 0.6, thereby setting a foundation for further research in this area.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The research has profound implications for enhancing neural sequence models' reliability. By improving hallucination detection, NLG systems can produce more accurate and trustworthy outputs. The proposed token-level detection enables more granular insights into generation errors, proving beneficial for quality estimation in translation tasks without relying on reference text.

Furthermore, the paper explores the application of hallucination labels in MT training, particularly under low-resource conditions. By integrating fine-grained loss metrics based on hallucination detection, they observed notable boosts in translation quality, reducing hallucinations. This approach underscores the potential of refined data handling techniques to maximize training efficacy from noisy datasets.

Future Directions

The advancements in hallucination detection open numerous paths for future research. Exploration into scaling hallucination detection models across different domains and languages remains crucial. Additionally, integrating hallucination detection mechanisms directly within generation models could help mitigate hallucination occurrence at the source, thereby enhancing intrinsic model consistency and robustness. Further development could also aim at refining synthetic data generation processes to improve training model fidelity to nuanced human evaluations.

This paper makes significant strides in addressing and mitigating hallucination in neural sequence generation, laying out a fundamental framework that balances theoretical insights with practical implications in AI model deployment.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube